UFC submission types ranked: most common and rarest finishes

Where the numbers came from: FightAlpha used the enriched UFC fight dataset, one row per fight, covering 8,745 UFC fights through June 20, 2026. This article filters to official Submission results and groups normalized method-detail text into technique families. The article tables summarize the source data used for the technique counts.

Most common UFC submission types

The rear naked choke is in its own tier. It accounts for 38.9% of all UFC submissions in this count, more than the guillotine and armbar combined. That makes sense: back control is one of MMA’s most stable finishing positions, and the choke works with gloves, sweat, fatigue, and limited mat time.

Are submissions different in the modern era?

Using 2011 onward as the modern UFC comparison window, submissions became less common overall: 17.8% of UFC fights since 2011 ended by submission, compared with 27.0% before 2011. The submission mix changed too. When fights do end by submission in the modern era, rear naked chokes, arm triangles, and D’Arce chokes take a bigger share, while armbars and triangle chokes take a smaller share.

Rarest UFC submission types

For this article, “rare” means rarest named technique families, excluding injury, verbal, and ambiguous submission labels. Exact official detail text can be noisy, so the table groups named techniques and keeps the main rarity claim focused on repeatable submission families.

Rare techniques are useful as fighter-specific context, not market-level prediction categories. Treat them as clues about specialists, scrambles, and defensive habits rather than baseline UFC finishing paths.

Pace/Pillory choke refers to the finish sometimes listed as the Pace choke or Pillory choke from Nick Pace’s 2010 submission of Will Campuzano.

The practical takeaway is not that a toe hold or twister can never happen. It is that the market should almost never be built around the rare technique itself. The better signal is broader: leg-lock threat, back control, scramble chaos, or a fighter repeatedly exposing the same defensive hole.

Rarest exact method-detail lines

If you do not group techniques, the bottom of the dataset gets even stranger. At the exact-detail level, many labels are one-offs: useful for audit, but too granular to use as standalone betting categories.

Methodology and limits

This page starts with fights whose official method is Submission, then groups method_details into technique families. For example, “Rear Naked Choke Technical Submission” and “Rear Naked Choke From back crucifix” both count as rear naked choke. Guillotine variants from guard, mount, front headlock, standing, or after dropping to guard all count as guillotine choke.

That grouping makes the table readable, but it also means the numbers are technique-family counts, not a perfect anatomical taxonomy. The collapsed exact-detail examples show how the source strings were folded into broader buckets without forcing every reader through a spreadsheet.

How to use the signal

For FightAlpha-style matchup work, commonness matters because it tells you which finishing paths are realistic. Back takes and guillotine traps show up constantly in MMA. A rare leg lock or exotic choke can still be live for a specialist, but it needs fighter-specific evidence, not just a fun prop price.

FAQ